기사상세페이지
[Movie Review] Steel Rain 2: Selfish Americans to blame
[Kukak newspaper= Washington Correspondent Michael Lambrau] Selfish Americans are to blame. This was the thought that rattled through my mind as I reflected on the recently released movie "Steel Rain 2: Summit.” The film dominated the South Korean box office in its opening weekend. Variety reported, "Steel Rain 2,” released by Lotte Entertainment, earned $4.92 million from 663,000 admissions in its opening weekend. In over just five days, the movie accumulated $7.03 million from 1.02 million in ticket sales.”
"Steel Rain 2,” like the first film "Steel Rain” (2017), begins with a coup by a hardline North Korean military faction. Only this time, instead of an assassination attempt on Kim Jong-un, the hardline faction, led by a fanatical North Korean General, kidnaps the U.S. President, South Korean President, and North Korean Supreme Leader during summit talks in North Korea and drags them to a North Korean submarine. The North Korean General, enraged over the summit talks, is at the center of an international conspiracy (in collaboration with Japan and China), to prevent a united Korea Peninsula and once again bring war to the region.
Obstacles of Perception
As an American watching the film I found myself stunned by the portrayal of the US President. In one of the defining scenes of the film the three leaders have a decision to make. In their escape from the submarine they must decide who will take the rescue boat (designed for one person) to safety. Without hesitation or discussion, the US President grabs hold of the ladder and announces he will take the rescue boat to safety. The South Korean President then scrambles to find another solution. He resourcefully removes the large seat (designed for one) in the rescue boat, making room for two passengers. With room for two in the rescue boat, the three leaders still have a difficult decision to make: Who will risk their life and stay behind on the submarine?
Again, the U.S. President quickly grabs hold of the ladder and starts to climb, telling the North Korean and South Korean leaders to work it out between the two of them. Watching this I cringed at the portrayal of the American President as self-serving, callous, and painfully unaware. Is this how the South Korean public perceives the US President? Is this how they perceive all Americans? The scene continued, culminating with the South Korean President staying behind, sacrificing himself, so the US President and North Korean Supreme Leader could survive and prevent nuclear war on the Korean Peninsula.
The film’s portrayal of the US president had me asking me even asking my fellow South Korean moviegoers their view, to which they responded with an immediate, "Of course that is the US. A natural portrayal of the US.” This depiction, although fictional, comes from a general perception of America that has possible real-world consequences. From the summit talks between the three nations, to US-South Korea cost-sharing negotiations, the US-South Korea alliance, although stronger than ever, must continually work on these obstacles of perception as well as more tangible obstacles.
Where will the next summit take place?
President Trump’s recent comments in the news, that "he will make deals with North Korea very quickly” if he wins re-election, signals the very real possibility of another summit after the US Presidential election. The film continued to tackle actual obstacles in North Korea-South Korea-US summitry with its vivid portrayal of a worst-case security scenario. An appropriate concern by security experts in all three nations is the physical location of any future summit. Until now the summits have only taken place at neutral locations: Panmunjom, Singapore, and Hanoi. Would the FBI and US Secret Service even approve a visit to Kaesong in North Korea? Would North Korean security approve a visit to Washington D.C. or Mar-a-logo? With a possible future summit on the horizon what would the security conditions entail to ensure the safety and security of all parties?
Collective Efforts
"Steel Rain 2” delivers in production quality, entertainment, and substance. In contrast to "Steel Rain” (2107), this installment approaches the Korean Peninsula from an international context. The film highlights South Korea’s role as merely a mediator for peace negotiations between the US and North Korea and all the constraints, parties, and frustrations of maintaining and improving the status quo on the Korean Peninsula.
Director Yang reminds the audience of the ongoing struggle to maintain stability and peace in the region as tensions and frustrations mount between the US, China, Russia, Japan, North Korea, and South Korea. He reminds the audience that the hard-fought peace must be continuously fought for, and if possible, improved by all parties in a collective effort. The construction of a peace regime, talks, summits, or negotiations must always be a collective effort that take us all one step towards stability and away from disaster.
많이본뉴스
많이 본 뉴스
- 1‘국악진흥법', 어떻게 시행되나?’(1)
- 2전인평의 ‘새로 보는 한국음악사’
- 3경성 모던걸들의 춤판 '모던정동'…"자유 갈망하는 모습 담아"
- 4도자의 여로 (143) <BR> 백자철화편병편과 수물(受物)편
- 5'스물다섯살 청춘이 되다' 음성품바축제 22∼26일
- 6'2024 젊은안무자창작공연' 최우수상에 박세진
- 7국립국악원 창작악단 기획공연, '긴 산조 협주곡'
- 8국립국악원 제38회 창작국악동요공모전<br> 대상에 작곡가 김여진씨의 ‘엇엇엇! 엇모리!’
- 9원장현 명인, “산조는 우리 삶의 소리”
- 10국가무형문화재 '살풀이춤' 보유자 정명숙 선생 별세, 향년 89세
- 11비는 오지만 신나는 '어린이날'
- 12로마에서, ‘2024-2025 상호문화교류의 해’ MOU. 국악 등 K컬처 행사